This is one of those news pieces that I come across from time to time that just begs for a line by line analysis. Article in black, my commentary in blue…

Wikipedia: The Free (and questionably accurate) Encyclopedia
WASHINGTON, Jan 16, 2012 (AFP) – Free online knowledge site Wikipedia will shut down for 24 hours later this week in protest at draft anti-online piracy legislation before the US Congress, founder Jimmy Wales said Monday on Twitter.
Wait, what?! Is that an appropriate way to protest anti-piracy legislation? Is Wikipedia worried they’ll be prosecuted for online piracy? And if they are, isn’t shutting down for 24 hours like saying, “If you don’t play nice, I’ll take my ball and go home”?
“Student warning! Do your homework early. Wikipedia protesting bad law on Wednesday!” Wales said on the microblogging site.
HAHAHA!! Does anyone else think it’s awesome that Jimmy Wales is so oblivious that he doesn’t realize that any teacher worth their salt won’t allow Wikipedia as a source?
“’Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.’ MLK – on Wednesday, Wikipedia demands,” Wales said, citing slain US civil rights leader Martin Luther King.
Whoa, trump card! If you’re trying to paint yourself and your billion dollar company as being oppressed, quoting Dr. King is an automatic win. But I feel like I must be missing something here. Can we get a breakdown of what’s going… oh, thanks, next paragraph…
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is currently before the House of Representatives, while the Protect IP Act is the version before the Senate.
Nope, nevermind… Still don’t know what’s going on…
The draft legislation has won the backing of Hollywood, the music industry, the Business Software Alliance, the National Association of Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce.
What else would you expect? The people who create and copyright the original work would like to get paid for it. Yay for capitalism!
But last month, the founders of Google, Twitter, Wikipedia, Yahoo! and other Internet giants expressed concern over the two drafts, saying in a open letter that they would “give the US government the power to censor the Web using techniques similar to those used by China, Malaysia and Iran.”
Ohhhhh… NOW I get why they’re upset. I don’t know if they’re right or not, but if they think the internet might get censored, I can understand why they feel the way they do. Because of course, as we all know, nothing on the internet needs to be censored, and everyone who puts words and pictures and videos on the internet is a little Einstein that everyone should listen to.
“We urge Congress to think hard before changing the regulation that underpins the Internet,” they said. “Let’s not deny the next generation of entrepreneurs and founders the same opportunities that we all had.”
I guess I still don’t understand what this SOPA thing is all about if these companies are worried that it will stifle entrepreneurship.
Wales said Wikipedia would go dark for a full 24 hours in English, saying: “Final details under consideration but consensus seems to be for ’full’ rather than ’soft’ blackout!”
This is just bad writing. I don’t know if Wales said in English that Wikipedia would go dark for 24 hours, or if he said that all the English pages on Wikipedia would go dark for 24 hours. If I can’t understand your protest, then you have just become part of the Occupy movement…
“This is going to be wow. I hope Wikipedia will melt phone systems in Washington on Wednesday. Tell everyone you know!” he said.
This is worse writing. And worse perspective. Does Jimmy Wales think people are going to call their U.S. representative if they can’t access Wikipedia for a day? No! They’re going to make some excuse to their teacher about how their homework got lost on a flash drive or in a flash mob, and turn it in the following day for a modest penalty.
Volunteer-staffed Wikipedia turned 11 years old on January 15th and boasts being the largest encyclopedia in history with more than 20 million articles in 282 languages.
So THAT’S how Jimmy Wales can estimate Wikipedia’s value at $3 billion. He’s not paying anybody for the work they do. Which really makes you wonder – if Wikipedia is worth $3 billion and no one except its founder is getting paid, why are they begging for money on all their pages now?
Have you seen any news lately that just begged for a line-by-line skewering? What do you think about parts of the internet going dark this week?
